Does Education Need to Change?

“This really happened. We were sitting there and I think they just went out of sequence, because we talked to the little boy afterward and we said, “You OK with that?” And he said, “Yeah, why? Was that wrong?” They just switched, that was it. Anyway, the three boys came in — four-year-olds with tea towels on their heads — and they put these boxes down, and the first boy said, “I bring you gold.” And the second boy said, “I bring you myrrh.” And the third boy said, “Frank sent this.” (4:47 – 5:22)

This excerpt from his child’s play sets up the rest on the Ted talk about changes to the education system very well. The argument of this Ted talk is about if the education system kills creativity. First, Robinson must set up a basis for this argument, that children are already more creative than adults. If children weren’t creative then Robinson thesis would fall apart since you can not take something away that is already not there. It is not only that this excerpt, about his son’s play, is important for his thesis, but it also shows how well structured his argument is. After telling the story Robinson transitions into talking about how kids are will to make mistakes and take their best guess, but in the corporate world of today that is looked down upon, so no one takes chances. No one doubts his authority since he was a university professor and is talking on TEDx, a very well respected organization. The one issue with having someone so well educated doing a talk is that it makes it difficult for the most people to identify with and could be difficult to understand, but by talking about how his own son and making jokes it is easy to understand for the rest of the public. He spends most of his argument putting in jokes for the audience. This makes the entire video much more enjoyable to watch and allows Robinson to get his message through. I do think there are other things Robinson could have done to improve his argument. If he had set up a power point then he could have shown statistics and graph that could back up his argument, but without and research sourced all we have to go on is Robinson’s logic argument. Without any for of visual argument there does seem to be something lacking but it does seem the Robinson’s intent was to start a conversation on education. This is because he only highlights the problem but does not offer any specific fix to the problem. It would be interesting to research into what he has done further for education since this Ted talk was from 2006.

4 thoughts on “Does Education Need to Change?”

  1. I want to show some thanks to the wreitr for bailing me from this setting.Just after researching throughout that the lookupengines and meeting ways which were not pleasant, I thoughtmy entire life was well over. Living minus that the answersto the problems you have resolved as a result of your site is aserious case, and that the ones that would have negatively damaged my career if I hadn’t noticed your web blog.Your main know-how and kindness in handling every part waspriceless. I don’t recognize what I would’ve done if I had not comeacross such a subject something like this. Ican also at this point look ahead to my future.Thanks for the time greatly for that the skilled and sensible guide.I will not be reluctant to suggest your web pages to any other person who should get guidelines about this topic.

  2. And I'm guessing there's separate funding provisions and exemptions for lawmakers who want the public to have nationalized health care and to drive Obamamobiles, but they will exempt themselves. What's good enough for us is not good enough for those elitists. 2010 cannot come soon enough.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.